Skip to content

How stablecoin issuers freeze stolen crypto, and what it means for your USDT and USDC

How Tether and Circle froze stolen stablecoins after the Binance hack, what their terms allow, why bitcoin can't be frozen, and the risks for ordinary holders.

Figures checked against 5 official and primary sources on . See the sources · How we check

Key points

  • After the October 2026 Binance hack, TRM Labs counted about $2.67 billion in stablecoins frozen by their issuers, led by Tether (about 1.77 billion USDT) and Circle (about 825 million USDC).
  • Their terms let them block addresses and freeze tokens, for example when they suspect illegal or prohibited use, or when a government requires it.
  • That power only exists for tokens an issuer controls. TRM said the attacker still held about $2.4 billion in assets beyond any issuer's reach, mostly ether and bitcoin.
  • Freezes can affect ordinary holders too: Circle's terms say USDC sent to or received from a blocked address may be frozen.
In this guide
  1. What was frozen after the Binance hack
  2. How freezing works
  3. What can’t be frozen
  4. Frozen isn’t the same as returned
  5. What it means for ordinary holders
  6. Is freezing good or bad?

Within hours of the October 2026 Binance hack, billions of dollars of the stolen crypto had been frozen, not by Binance, but by the companies that issue stablecoins. Tether and Circle can stop specific tokens from moving. That power limited the damage from the biggest crypto theft on record, and it’s worth understanding if you hold stablecoins yourself.

This guide explains how issuers freeze tokens, what their terms say, what can’t be frozen, and how it could affect ordinary holders. For the hack itself, see the $6.3 billion Binance hack.

What was frozen after the Binance hack

Blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs counted the freezes on chain. As of 00:30 UTC on 30 October 2026, it reported:

Issuer Stablecoin Frozen, according to TRM
Tether USDT about 1.77 billion
Circle USDC about 825 million
Ripple RLUSD 40.5 million
World Liberty Financial USD1 27.8 million

In total, about $2.67 billion. TRM said Tether froze 971.1 million USDT in the attacker’s main receiving wallet 37 minutes after the main theft, and Circle froze 823 million USDC in coordination with law enforcement. Separately, Arbitrum’s Security Council used its emergency powers to move about $30 million of ETH and ARB out of the attacker’s reach.

The attacker tried to race the freezes. According to TRM, it sold about 325 million USDT to market makers for ether, at a steep discount, and borrowed ether against USDT on the lending protocol Aave.

How freezing works

A stablecoin like USDT or USDC is a token issued by a company. The issuer controls the token’s smart contract, and that contract lets it block particular addresses. Once an address is blocked, the tokens in it can’t be moved. See stablecoins explained.

The issuers’ own terms spell out the power.

Circle (USDC)

Circle’s USDC Terms, last updated on 15 October 2026, say that Circle:

  • reserves the right to block USDC addresses that it determines, in its sole discretion, may be associated with illegal activity or activity that violates its terms, and to freeze the associated USDC, temporarily or permanently, where it custodies those addresses;
  • reserves the right to block the transfer of USDC to and from an address on chain, as its blocklisting policy permits;
  • may be required to freeze USDC if it receives a legal order from a valid government authority.

Tether (USDT)

Tether’s terms, last updated on 26 February 2026, say Tether may:

  • freeze any Tether tokens you hold, as required by law or where it decides, in its sole discretion, that it’s prudent;
  • if it suspects prohibited use, report it to authorities, freeze or confiscate tokens and blacklist any address holding Tether tokens;
  • seize property and deliver it to a government or law enforcement where circumstances warrant;
  • suspend your access to its services, including purchases and redemptions, for example when a government directs it to or when it believes someone is trying to gain unauthorized access to your wallet.

What can’t be frozen

Freezing only works where an issuer has that control. Bitcoin and ether have no company behind them that can block an address. TRM said that, after the freezes, the attacker still controlled about $2.4 billion in assets beyond any issuer’s reach, including the stolen bitcoin, which it was splitting through a “peel chain” to make it harder to follow.

For those assets, the defense is different: exchanges and other services can refuse deposits linked to the theft. After the 2025 Bybit hack, the FBI asked exchanges, bridges, blockchain analytics firms and other services to block transactions with addresses used by the attackers. TRM said it expects the Binance attacker to use cross-chain bridges, swap services and over-the-counter brokers next. See crypto bridges explained.

Frozen isn’t the same as returned

A freeze stops a thief moving the tokens. It doesn’t automatically send them back to the victim. What happens next depends on the issuer’s processes and any legal orders, which can take time.

What it means for ordinary holders

The same power that stops thieves can affect anyone:

  • You can be caught up in a freeze. Circle’s terms say that if you send USDC to, or receive USDC from, a blocked address, Circle may freeze it and take steps to terminate your USDC account.
  • You could lose redemption rights. Circle’s terms say that in some cases you may forfeit rights associated with your USDC, including the ability to redeem it for dollars.
  • You may not be told. Tether’s terms say that if it suspects prohibited use, it can report it to authorities without notice to you.

Practical steps

  1. Don’t accept stablecoins from unknown sources, especially as part of “too good to be true” offers.
  2. Check addresses before you send, and pay attention to your platform’s warnings.
  3. Read the terms of any stablecoin you hold in size.
  4. Remember the issuer risk: a stablecoin depends on the company behind it, and the collapse of TerraUSD showed that not every “stablecoin” stays stable.

Is freezing good or bad?

Both views exist. Freezing limited losses in the Binance hack and in earlier thefts. It also shows that stablecoins aren’t censorship-resistant in the way bitcoin is: a company can stop your tokens from moving. Which matters more to you depends on why you hold them.

Frequently asked questions

Can Tether freeze my USDT?
Its terms say it can freeze Tether tokens you hold where the law requires it or where it decides, in its sole discretion, that it's prudent. If it suspects prohibited use, it can also blacklist addresses, freeze or confiscate tokens and report the matter to authorities without telling you.
Can Circle freeze my USDC?
Circle's USDC Terms say it may block addresses it determines may be associated with illegal activity or violations of its terms, block transfers of USDC to and from an address on chain under its blocklisting policy, and freeze USDC if it receives a legal order from a valid government authority.
Why can't bitcoin be frozen the same way?
Stablecoins like USDT and USDC are issued by a company that can block addresses in its token's smart contract. Bitcoin and ether have no issuer with that kind of control, which is why TRM said part of the Binance loot was beyond any issuer's reach.
Could my stablecoins be frozen even if I did nothing wrong?
It's possible to be caught up in a freeze. Circle's terms say that if you send USDC to, or receive USDC from, a blocked address, Circle may freeze it and take steps to terminate your USDC account, and you may forfeit rights associated with it, including the ability to redeem it for dollars.
Does freezing return the money to victims?
Not automatically. A freeze stops the thief moving the tokens. What happens to them next depends on the issuer's processes and any legal orders, which can take time.

Sources

  1. USDC Terms (last updated 15 October 2026) — Circle
  2. Token Terms of Sale and Service (last updated 26 February 2026) — Tether
  3. North Korea Steals USD 6.36 Billion From Binance in the Largest Hack in History (29 October 2026) — TRM Labs
  4. Binance targeted in $6.3 billion crypto heist, the largest ever (29 October 2026) — NBC News
  5. North Korea Responsible for $1.5 Billion Bybit Hack (PSA, 26 February 2025) — FBI, Internet Crime Complaint Center

First published . Spotted an error or an outdated figure? Tell us and we will check it against the source.